Product Review: Vertx Smock


A while back, when I wrote about my fighting load and approach loads, I mentioned an upcoming review of my (then) new Vertx smock. Here it is.

I first came across the smock concept, and the Vertx offering in particular, via a series of posts from Soldier Systems (here, here, and here). It is a concept that has had a lot of popularity in European militaries (as well as Australian), but never really caught on in the US. I saw one in person for the first time when a couple of Canadian officers passed me in my work center (my career field works closely with the Canadians). It looked big and billowy, but had a kind of vintage military charm to it. It just screamed utilitarian and comfortable. I have wanted one every since.

I continued to read more and more about them and their value to a variety of people, from military members to outdoorsmen. I really wanted a Vertx one in particular, as it had several new and fancy technical additions that other varieties did not. However, the prohibitive cost of the Vertx (it was nearly $500 at the time) meant that I was looking elsewhere. There are several companies out there making them: SORD USA, Arktis, First Spear (also $$$), and a variety of European companies that manufacture smocks as issue items for various militaries. I’ll put a list at the bottom of the review.

So what is a smock, and why has it never caught on in the US?

Sgt Harold Marshall of the Canadian Calgary Highlander Sniper Section in WWII
Sgt Harold Marshall of the Canadian Calgary Highlander Sniper Section in WWII
For lack of a better phrase, think of a smock as a wearable go-bag (which is exactly how Vertx markets their model). They will universally have a variety of large pockets positioned all around the garment to store equipment such as ammunition, survival gear, navigation gear, rations, and comm gear.. They are generally windproof, but not necessarily waterproof or insulated. They are cut generously to allow for the wearing of load bearing equipment under the jacket, but it is also common to wear equipment on the outside as needed.

Field Marshall Montgomery in his customized Denison Smock
The origin of the modern combat smock comes from the British Airborne in WWII, who wore the Denison Smock– which itself was derived from the German Luftwaffe Knockhensack (“bone sack”). It was originally issued to the British special operations units and paras, but became popular among high ranking officers as well. It was famously worn by Field Marshall Bernard Montgomery (pictured). As the years progressed, the smock became a general issue item in a variety of camouflage patterns.

The closest US equivalent was the M-1943 field jacket (and it’s subsequent replacements, the M-1951 and ubiquitous M-1965). However, these jackets were designed more as insulated outerwear garments and have a closer cut to match the lines of a typical military uniform. They were built with a different philosophy than the smock. I’m not going to knock the utility of the M65 jacket, as many a GI will attest to their usefulness, but the smock is designed so that you could practically live out of it if you needed to.

The Vertx Smock


As much as i wanted the Vertx smock, a price over $400 just wasn’t realistic. However, Vertx recently dropped the price down to $199, so I thought it was time to pounce. As of this writing, the price is for this version is still $199. My smock is Coyote Brown and size large. The jacket is made from a 40D nylon material that has been treated with water-repelling nanosphere. It’s not designed to be waterproof, but I’ve worn it outside during several rainstorms at this point without issue. It is windproof, but uninsulated. Think of it as a water resistant hard shell that you can wear layers under.

DSC_0611It has a total of 10 pockets. There are two chest, two bicep, two lower front, two on the side, and two large pockets over the butt (where other jackets would have a single large trapper pocket, this smock divides it into separate compartments). The two chest pockets and two butt-pockets have inner sleeves that hold 30 rd 5.56 magazines. The two pockets directly on the sides are also designed to carry magazines. This allows the wearer to carry six full 5.56 mags in readily accessible compartments. If that is not your intent, the two rear pockets will each hold a USGI canteen, and the other magazine pockets will hold any similarly sized item (iPhones, radios, etc.). The two bicep pockets are cavernous, and topped with large hook and loop panels for display of patches or other identifying materials. The two lower front pockets are lined with waffled fleece to help keep hands warm. The lower front pockets are closed with two large slotted buttons, the biceps and chest pockets are closed with zippers, and all others have hook and loop closures (Sorry for the string of pictures, I couldn’t get it to format correctly).

The very generously sized chest pocket
The very generously sized chest pocket

Chest pocket opening
Chest pocket opening

Chest pocket inner sleeve (imagine my iPhone is a 30 round mag…I live in California, after all)

Bicep pocket hook and loop panel
Bicep pocket hook and loop panel (Yes, that’s a patch from a game series, I’m a nerd)

Sleeve pocket size
Sleeve pocket size

Front Lower button pockets
Front Lower button pockets

Front lower pocket hand warmer lining
Front lower pocket hand warmer lining

Side pocket between the front and rear, big enough to hold a magazine-sized item
Side pocket between the front and rear, big enough to hold a magazine-sized item

Back pocket magazine sleeve
Back pocket magazine sleeve

Back pocket holding USGI-style canteen (I have Nalgene Oasis versions)
The hood is detachable via slotted buttons, and the inner side is lined with the same waffled fleece as the two lower front pockets. It is not sized to go over a helmet, as you will find on other military-oriented smocks. There are several drawstrings on the hood to adjust fitment.

Hood attachment and adjustment
Hood attachment and adjustment
On the inside, the jacket has more drawstrings in the middle and at the bottom. There are pit zips under the arm to help with ventilation; a mesh has been sewn in this area to keep debris out when the zip is open. The cuffs have hook and loop closures to adjust the opening around the arm.

Pit zips
Pit zips

Interior fitment adjustments
Interior fitment adjustments
The main closure consists of an inner zipper that runs all the way up to a stand-up collar and then an outer weather flap secured with hook and loop. When I have the zipper all the way up, the hood over my head, cuffs cinched down, and other adjustments set, the jacket does a decent job of retaining warmth and keeping elements out.

The exterior of the jacket is treated Schoeller Nanosphere, which makes the fabric water repellant. From the advertising materials, the treatment also does wonders on other dirt and stains, making the garment easy to keep clean. The interior is not coated, and does wick away moisture and keep the jacket breathable. I had seen some other reviews of the Vertx smock that showed a dedicated moisture wicking liner on the inside of the jacket, but I do not have such a lining and Vertx’s web site no longer mentions such a lining in either the Multicam or solid color variants.

I’ve used this jacket through several range trips, hikes, and chilly early-morning walks with the dog in the rain. So far, I am very pleased.

Taking a standard shooting position, the BCM vertical grip is a new addition I am experimenting with for a future post
If there is one word that sums up how I think this jacket fits into the philosophy of an Everyday Marksman, it would be “Mobility!” The jacket, with well-designed gussets and articulated elbows, is clearly designed for active users. At no point while using the smock have I felt that it hindered my movement in any way. That says a lot, since I almost always have issued with outerwear binding or limiting me in some way.

The uninsulated and unlined nature of the garment means that it provides very little assistance in the cold. My first morning out with it was in the mid 40’s, and I immediately regretted not wearing some more layers under it. It will do a great job keeping the wind off of you, but expect to layer up under it (as designed). Conversely, that means that it also performs pretty well in the heat.

When it comes to rain performance, it did keep me dry underneath; however, I would plan on carrying an additional rain layer for either wearing on top of the smock, or under it, if you plan on dealing with serious rainstorms for extended periods of time.

i do wish that the jacket had one additional feature, and this is more of a personal preference than anything. Other modern smock designs have button-closure chest pockets, with additional side entry zippered pockets under them. This one just has the zipper pockets (albeit, very generously sized ones). The lack of button pockets doesn’t affect the garment’s utility in any way, and may actually help reduce bulk if you are wearing gear on top of the jacket. As designed, it offers a nice and streamlined appearance. But, still, I guess I’m a sucker for a hint of old-school. To me, the huge expanse of empty material on the chest seems like it could have been put to more use on a garment billed as a wearable go-bag.

I can wear my belt kit under the jacket for a “low profile” appearance, but the bulk of my set up does create some unsightly bulges. The jacket is cut more generously in the chest, so a chest rig might work better for such applications (I don’t have one to experiment with), but a low profile CCW-style belt would work just fine. A better system is to wear it on top, as the Brits and Aussies do. When worn in the this fashion, it also lets you use the interior of the jacket as a giant “dump pouch,” where you can drop spent magazines down the front of the smock.

Wearing belt under the smock
Wearing belt under the smock

Wearing the belt on the outside in a more "old school" fashion
Wearing the belt on the outside in a more “old school” fashion
I really like this jacket, and I plan on getting a lot of use out of it. That said, I’m also looking at also buying a smock from SORD USA. The SORD model I’m looking at is all cotton, which would provide a bit more breathability in warm weather, and has a slightly different pocket configuration.

The Bottom Line

The Good

  • Intelligently designed for active wearers
  • Lots of well positioned pockets for carrying of essential kit
  • High-tech material helps keep you dry and comfortable
  • Generously cut to keep a low profile if you need to

The OK

  • The large and empty expanse on top of the zippered chest pockets just begs for additional pockets
  • If you plan on wearing bulky kit under it, plan on getting it a size up

The Bad

  • I’ve got nothing

Who should buy this?

The Vertx smock makes a great choice for any outdoorsman or shooter looking for a useful wind-proof garment that will move with them and carry loads of stuff. If you need a jacket to survive the zombie apocalypse with you, this one should be on your short list.

List of other Smock Manufacturers

If you are interested in the smock concept, then here is a list of other quality manufacturers that I’ve come across during my research. If my funds were unlimited, I would love to buy one (or two) from each, and have a whole collection. Sadly, I’m not that rich.

Arktis manufactures several varieties, I’ve been told to start with the B110

First Spear Squadron Smock

Leo Kohler KSK Smock

SOD Gear Operative Parka

SORD USA (Smock and General Purpose Jacket)

TYR Tactical Huron Smock ($$$!!)


7 thoughts on “Product Review: Vertx Smock”

  1. Great write up. I just started deer hunting and have been looking for better way to lug all the stuff I may need and a back-strapped tree stand without carrying my backpack. This is good food for thought. Thanks.

    1. Thanks! I do think smocks would make a great field/hunting jacket. In hindsight, I feel like I should have taken some pictures while wearing a backpack to show how well a mid-sized backpack would work with this type of jacket for several days in the field.

  2. My thought on this sort of thing is a vest. The typical “tactical” vest is so long it interferes with wearing a fanny pack/loaded-up pistol belt, so I found a short above-the-waist angler’s vest at the local Good will ($7, passed on another identical one for $10, wish I hadn’t). Haven’t had time to mess with it yet, but it can be worn in summer over a T-shirt, in winter under a smock/M65, under a loose-fitting BDU blouse, or over your plate carrier or under a chest rig. Good for when it’s not “smock weather”, and you’ll still have some stuff with you when you take off the smock and your LBE.
    No 30-rd. mag pouches on the front, but you can fit an old school 20-rd. (which lets you get lower in prone) and a big wide pocket in back. I figure compass/map, small flashlight and extra batteries, emergency rations (food bars and small summer sausages, or stripped MRE), fire starting kit, water filter straw, fleece beanie or balaclava, wad of 550 cord, small knife sharpener, 16-oz. flask, water treatment pills, tarp-type green/silver space blanket or folded poncho…whatever.
    If you are handy with needle and thread, customizing potential abounds.

    But yeah, smocks are neat….

    1. I’ve actually seen many people using vests the way you describe. As far as I’m concerned, it’s a perfectly good solution. I think a lot of folks don’t realize the value of distributing weight around your clothing versus stuffing it all in a backpack.

      1. Not just a matter of weight distribution, it lets you retain a lot of useful items in your walk-around clothing after you peel off the outer layers of battle-rattle.


Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s